USA Today: Some say schools giving Muslims special treatment.

Yes, you can include me in the some. I have been saying it for quite a while now.

In this article by Oren Dorrell writes that some public schools and universities are granting Muslims requests for prayer times, prayer rooms and ritual foot baths.

University of Michigan at Dearborn has plans to build a footbath for Muslim students to wash their feet before prayer.

An elementary school in San Diego allows an extra recess period for Muslim students to pray.

Amazing, all this is being paid with your tax dollars. Isn’t that just great. So much for separation of church and state, in fact where is the ACLU on this? Well, it seems this is a gray area.

Barry Lynn, of Americans United for the Separation of Church and State, says however that the law is murky on these expressions of faith. And the American Civil Liberties Union says overt religious symbols like crucifixes are not legal, but whether Muslim footbaths and prayer rugs fall into that category is not clear.

"That's a difficult one, and it's right on the edge," says Jeremy Gunn, director of the ACLU program on freedom of religion and belief in Washington, D.C.

The ACLU claims they are waiting to see what kind of policy the schools settles on before deciding whether to sue or not.
I guess that must be because the “law is murky” or just “not clear.” Well, let me clear the water up for you.

It is pretty obvious what kind of policies the schools are deciding to settle on. Here is an idea, how about trying to get extra recess sessions for Christian and Catholic students to pray. How far do you think you would get with that before the ACLU puts a stop to it? They definitely would not be using the where going to see where the school settles on before we sue routine. They have filed lawsuits for quite less in the past.

This is nothing less than a victory for Muslims who wish to see the United States under Islamic Law. They continue to use political correctness as their weapon to accomplish their goals.
Now before you start with the hate mail, let me make it clear, I know not all Muslims care about an Islamic state, in fact most probably just want to be left alone, but there are far to many that would use the power of government to achieve Islamic law.

I use to not believe in the separation of Church and State. I believe that Thomas Jefferson was not in favor of religious abolition from the public spectrum, but rather was trying to say one religion should not be favored over the other. However, it now seems the only way to do that is to have separation of Church and State.

Let’s be honest, while we are at it. There are several Christian groups in this country that are just as guilty of using the power of government to try and spread their laws as well.

There, now I will get hate mail from both groups!

The continued appeasement of Islam

It is amazing the hypocrisy our government will take when it comes to religions. Christians are not allowed to openly pray in public schools, the Ten Commandments have been stripped off of virtually every government building imaginable. However, it seems the same separation of church and state standard doesn’t apply to Muslims.

If you were to walk into the FBI building in Omaha, Nebraska, there is a giant plaque on the wall from the Muslim Public Affairs Council and the American Muslim Association. Usually the plaque would be covered up by a Christmas tree around the holidays, but somehow I am willing to bet the ACLU is not going to allow that to happen this time around?
This plaque is commemorating the victims of September 11th. Now most of you are probably thinking, what is wrong with that? What do you have against a plaque commemorating the victims of 9-11? Well, here is why, I have done my homework and research and

found that this so called commemoration is nothing less than a PR scam. Here is why:
After 9-11 the Executive Director of Muslim Public Affairs Council, Al-Marayati went on the radio and suggested that Israel had the most to gain by the 9/11 attacks and should be considered the chief suspect.

The Communications Director of the Muslim Public Affairs Council was the managing editor of a publication applauding Osama bin Laden as a "great Mujahid," a "philanthropist" and a "freedom fighter."

Richard Gephart (a democrat), while the House minority leader, appointed Al-Marayati to head a National Commission on Terrorism. The appointment was finally rescinded after backlash saying that Al-Marayati has a "long record over many, many years of rationalizing and justifying terrorism."

Yeah, I know it is just a plaque, but can’t you see this for what it is folks. It is the continuous Islamic takeover of society. Today it is a plaque, tomorrow it is getting the local public school to not serve pork and allow Muslim prayer, until they reach the point of dominance in society. One must look no further than Europe to witness this, especially in places like the Netherlands.
The Dutch government used tax dollars to build mosques and madressas (Muslim Schools) among other things. The Dutch were so sure Muslims would assimilate into their culture. Instead they ended up with more than a million Muslims that opted for radical Islam. You know the type, like the ones that slaughtered film maker Theo Van Gogh in broad daylight.